Group therapy the board game

Offer a prize to the group if they can find the magic block before the tower falls. This can be anything from a treat to extra minutes of free play time or allowing the person who finds the star to select the next game the group plays. However, if the tower falls before anyone can find the magic block, then the group has to complete a task this can be anything from cleaning, to exercise, to singing a silly song.

Were you focused primarily on finding the star or were you enjoying the process of playing the game? Once the star was found, did you want to continue to play the game to see how high the tower would go, or to see who would knock it over, or was the fun over?

Have you ever been so focused on getting something in your life that once you achieved it you were left wondering what to do next? Is it good to have things in your life that you are striving to find? Are there some things you could be striving for that are negative? Do you ever miss out on things in your life because you are so focused on a goal that only the future seems to matter? How can you achieve balance in your life when striving to reach a goal?

Rich vs. Objective To understand how we react to the situations we are born into and to recognize ways to improve our own situation. Group Size 4 to 8 is ideal but could have more if have bigger teams. Description Place one card from each of the property groups in a pile. Shuffle the pile and evenly distribute the cards to the group members.

If there are extra properties, have group members roll the die and the highest roller gets to select an extra property. Continue until one card from each property group has been distributed. Once everyone has their cards, give them the other properties that go with their set s.

Each card set in the game should belong to someone. Money is distributed based on the amount of money each property would cost to buy e. The railroads and utilities are up for grabs if anyone wants to buy them when landing on those spaces.

The game can be played using the Chance and Community Chest Cards or simply make those free spaces. Now, play a regular game with each person moving around the board. At the end of the game, discuss the feelings individuals have towards those who started with less and those who started the game with more. Did you feel that one player had an advantage over the others in this game?

If so, how did this make you feel? Do you ever look at what others have and get jealous? If so, why do you think you have these feelings? Is there a way to move yourself into a situation where you have more security in your life than you have now? What will it take for you to do this?

What changes can you make in your life to change your current situation? Focus the questions on anger management issues if you have individuals who react with anger when others have more than them. Truth or Lie? Objective To share how you view yourself in a non-threatening manner. Who People who have a hard time sharing openly about how they view themselves.

Groups who could benefit from getting to know one another at a deeper level. Description Spread the red and green cards out on the table. Each person selects three cards that they would use to describe themselves the truth ; they also pick out three cards that are the opposite of who they are a lie.

Both the truth and the lie can be green or red cards. Each person should have their own two sets of cards in two piles face down in front of them. Nobody else in the group knows which pile is a truth and which one is a lie. Starting with one member of the group, the leader randomly selects one of the piles or the person sitting next to them can do this as well and asks the person to turn those cards over for all to see.

Voting can be done by asking or by using the green and red cards to vote any green or red card will do. Simply place a red card down on the table if it is thought to be a lie and green if it seems to be true. Give one point to anyone who guesses correctly. After each turn, ask to see the opposite pile and have the person explain why they selected the cards they did.

Was it harder to find cards that were true about yourself or ones that were lies? Was it hard for you to find positive things about yourself? Were you surprised to learn this information? Building Words. Objective To discover how the choices we make as individuals can affect others.

Group Size 4 or more. Description Divide the group into teams of two to eight members each. One at a time, each team member will go to where you have a pile of letter tiles laid out and select a specific number of tiles. You want each team to end up with a total of around 20 tiles.

When selecting the tiles, allow individuals to look at the letters. Once everyone has collected their tiles, team members reveal the letters they chose to their own team and put them all into one pile. Set a time limit three to five minutes , and challenge the teams to use their letters to make as many words as possible by rearranging them.

Have them write down the words on their paper. You may give points according to how many words they come up with, extra points for longer words, etc. The team with the most points at the end wins. Did the letters you chose make it easier or harder for the group to create words? Did you have control over what letters your team members chose? If you chose your letters after they had been picked through, how was your selection compared to others? In your own life, do you ever experience times when the choices you make have an affect on a group of people?

Do you find the choices you make in life usually help or hurt others? Do you feel like you have control over the choices you make? If others make poor choices that affect you, how can you overcome this obstacle? After each team has made as many words as they can with their letters, have them write the words down on a list.

Send the list and letters to another group, who can get bonus points for any additional words they make. Let people collectively choose which letters to use. Next, either allow them to keep the letters or make them trade with another group. Story Clues. Objective To play a communication game requiring individuals to listen carefully to determine the clues in the story.

Who People who have trouble sharing their feelings directly and who hope others can pick up on hints and clues. Group Size 2 or more. Description Give each person a piece of paper and a pen. One person in the group selects a card and must tell a short story using all the words on it. It was a meta-question, really.

I think I know, I say. Haven remembers they had pitched another idea for an episode. The staff at All in the Family rewrote it and made it about the actual game. Group Therapy spawned a sequel Couples , more on that soon , parodies Therapy! That was unique.

It does sound a lot like how we react to Facebook posts, click hearts or retweet, up- or down-vote, swipe left or right. With it or copping out, all judged in our worldwide group therapy game on the Internet. Whoever advances merely has to act authentic, or at least convince a majority of being With It, to be truly free.

Man: React the way you really would. Then things changed. And so we never made attempts to publish more. We all went our separate ways. Ross and Haven were paid to write several sitcom pilots, as well as punching up scripts. But he wants to have one pure moment. Klein continued to write and has in his 60s found a niche as a best-selling co-writer of philosophy-themed humor books, beginning with Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes.

When we were freelancers, we did so many things to pay the bills. But once you have kids, you want something fulfilling but also steady. And this just fit me. I love doing it, probably even more than writing. No one mentions in their biographies the game they wrote that made its way into half a million homes. Group Therapy represented a time when my family was still together, played games together.

When we opened up. Got in touch. Were free. Did I ever, lugging that box from apartment to apartment, play a real game of Group Therapy? The game is beside the point. I find myself replacing things from my childhood, item by item, in the hope the child returns.

What level of fame are we talking about? My wife gives me a look that says get on with it. I tell her the short version. It was the second time the Major National Newspaper panned one of my books, actually, but this time it was worse. Much worse. I considered my life ruined, done, or at least the writing part of it. Scott Fitzgerald uses. A more accurate term might be nervous breakdown. I stayed in bed for weeks except to go to work or go the bathroom.

Mornings, our oldest daughter climbed over the bedspread to look for me under the pillows. Her face expresses genuine empathy. We continue to play, not as a group, but as a duet. We will learn a little more about each other. Neither of us will win. Emerson was thought to be an emblem of America the Symbol: America the new birth of freedom, the unlimited frontier of possibility.

Here is a typical sally of literary brutality directed at Transcendentalist Margaret Fuller and fellow travelers Cornelius Mathews and William Ellery Channing. Why she said it, Heaven only knows — unless it was because she was Margaret Fuller, and wished to be taken for nobody else.

Longfellow and Lowell, so pointedly picked out for abuse as the worst of our poets, are, upon the whole, perhaps, our best — although [William Cullen] Bryant , and one or two others are scarcely inferior. As for the two favorites, selected just as pointedly for laudation, by Miss F. To speak algebraically: — Mr. The Transcendentalists were quite relentlessly affirming. We might compare, from a century later, John Dewey vs. Mencken : the inspiring optimist and the withering uproarious cynic.

He was at once more rationalistic and more pathological than any of them. His darkest characters examine themselves rationally as psychological case studies. The Transcendentalists wrote to bring light and hope to the world; Poe showed that light makes shadows. Emerson conceived human beings as fragments of a perfectly good God. The following is quite characteristic: As a plant upon the earth, so a man rests upon the bosom of God; he is nourished by unfailing fountains, and draws, at his need, inexhaustible power.

Who can set bounds to the possibilities of man? Once inhale the upper air, being admitted the absolute natures of justice and truth, and we learn that man has access to the entire mind of the Creator, is himself the creator in the finite.

But of course the yin-yang is a symbol of the interdependence of opposites. At the center of the light is a seed of darkness, and at the center of the darkness a seed of light. Both Poe and Emerson faced the loss of beloved wives Ellen and Virginia, respectively , Emerson also of his son Waldo. Poe endured the death of almost everyone he ever loved. I think it is not necessarily what they experienced that accounts for the difference of their philosophies, though overall Emerson had the easier road in life few writers have ever had a harder road than Poe.

I think, rather, their respective writerly personae represent what they were as human beings before they ever wrote anything for publication, and embody the strategies they developed to deal with their own suffering: transcending it with hope, or facing it in its every dark twist.

In both cases, the intrinsic temperament became a picture of their own nation and of the whole universe. Characteristically, he thought the universe is now in its collapsing phase, but uncharacteristically he ecstatically understands the collapse as a unification of all things, all spirits, all bodies, all oppositions, into oneness, and into God.

He says that we are fragments of the Divine, being pulled by gravity into unity. In the meantime bear in mind that all is Life — Life — Life within Life — the less within the greater, and all within the Spirit Divine.

It could have been written by Emerson. Bronson Alcott was the Transcendentalist educator and father of Louisa May. The North American Review was published in Massachusetts, perhaps enough to earn this bit of derision. I remember playing the game in my apartment in Bridgeport, Ct. I wish I could find to buy another one of those games somewhere.

Any suggestions? I would like to see whether playing it now again, as a senior citizen, it would help to reveal the type of person that I grew into over the years. The NYT article was great, and is sure to generate a lot of interest. In these tumultuous times, opening up to friends is a real beneficial escape.

Your email address will not be published. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.